Monday, May 18, 2015

Five Tips on Getting Non-Fiction Pieces Published As A Young Writer

This piece benefited from contributions from Julian Baird Gewirtz, a Rhodes Scholar and doctoral candidate at Oxford whose work has appeared in The New Yorker, the Economist, the Wall Street Journal, Foreign Policy, and the Atlantic, among others.

I often chat with friends who are interested in publishing an op-ed or non-fiction essay. I have made many mistakes trying to do this which hopefully you can avoid; here are some tips. Take this with a grain of salt; it’s just one approach, and others may work better.

1. Maximize the odds that someone actually reads your piece. Here is a list of people ranked by how likely they are to respond to you:

  1. an editor with whom you’ve previously published.
  2. an editor with whom you have some other connection (someone you’ve met, a third-party intro, be creative).
  3. an writer / editor you’ve found online. This is often how I pitch something (do not feel like you need a personal connection to an editor to send them writing!) Here’s how I find an editor: after identifying a publication, I look through its articles to find one that’s similar to what I’m trying to publish (if you can’t find an article like that, you might want to find another publication). Hopefully the author is an editor with an email address I can find; writers are okay too. If this doesn’t work, you could try checking the publication’s masthead. I try not to email anyone with a job title that sounds too important.
  4. the general submission email for the publication. I have never had success emailing “opinions@publicationX” or “tips@publicationX”. Greg Smith, who published this widely read article, sent it to the NYT general op-ed address, had no luck, and emailed it to four editors, who responded. I’m not saying don’t ever email a general submissions email, but I haven’t had luck doing this, and I would try a real person first if you can.

Do not submit a piece to multiple editors simultaneously. I know, it’s tempting to save time, but it’s considered a faux pas by many editors and if they find out that you’re doing it, you risk pissing them off.

Okay, so you’ve found an email address. Keep your initial email short. Here is a recent representative pitch I sent to an editor.

Dear X,

I am a computer scientist who has written previously for the New York Times, FiveThirtyEight, and Quartz. I have a piece which I hoped might be of interest to the Atlantic: it's about what analyzing email data can tell you about love. The piece is attached and also pasted below.

I hope your weekend has gone well, and thanks very much for your time.
Emma Pierson
--

I modify how I describe myself depending on who I’m writing to (this email was to a computer scientist). Shiny credentials are probably helpful but don’t go crazy with them. I often use an email address that does not reveal my gender. I always attach the full piece (and also paste it into the email).

Some people also pitch short descriptions of a potential piece without having written it; I don’t have much experience with that, but Julian does. He adds: “If you have a specific idea for a piece but are worried that it will require more research or time than you can realistically spare without knowing that an editor is interested, it’s very common to send a (slightly more detailed) pitch to an editor before actually writing the piece. I’ve never had a piece accepted only from a pitch, but I have had editors express interest, which motivated me to write something that they subsequently accepted... and, in other cases, something they subsequently rejected. Of course, you have to be sure that the piece is viable, and that you’ll be able to get the access you need. (Two exceptions to this are book reviews, where the publication will get the advance copy of the book on your behalf, and interviews, where the publication’s brand will often be essential to getting the interview.) I’d recommend only doing this for pieces that you are pitching for print, to weeklies, monthlies, and the like. In my limited experience, online editors usually prefer just to read the piece and accept or reject it based on that; they’re not working on lengthy timelines.”

2. Ways to break in. Okay, but how do you get started if you’ve never published anything before? Mostly, aim high and pitch a lot. Getting rejected costs you nothing; getting published gains you a lot. So, ignore your ego. In many academic fields, people first send their papers to the most competitive journals, expecting them to get rejected; then they move down. I would view publishing articles this way.  Caveat: do not spam editors (I don’t think I’ve ever sent an editor who rejected me a second piece within a month.) Also, obviously, don’t send out shoddy work. I don’t send anything out for publication unless at least one person whose opinion I respect has read it.

One way to ignore your ego: do not take a rejection as a reflection on the quality of the piece. There is so much bad stuff that is so widely read! Nothing you write can be worse than that. If I have something I think is good, I send it to at least two or three editors before giving up. Also, if I don’t hear back from an editor, I send a follow-up a week later; I try to make it sound like it was my fault they didn’t respond. All of my most widely read pieces have gotten rejected several times before they were published. Learn to love rejection (this also describes my dating strategy).

Also, consider starting a blog. This offers a few benefits:

  1. Gives you a compiled collection of work which you can send to publications that are looking for freelancers (this is how I got started at FiveThirtyEight)
  2. Posts can get picked up by other publications. When you write a blog post, you can post it other places (I use Reddit, Twitter, Hacker News, and Facebook).
  3. Gives you a place to put pieces that no one else will publish (which makes me more willing to write risky or personal pieces).

3. Be sensitive to time-sensitivity. Some pieces are “evergreen” -- they are about perennially interesting topics and will not get less publishable with time. But no one wants to read about a Twitter hashtag that spiked a month ago unless you can somehow make it fresh. Unfortunately, the timescale required for careful writing or analysis does not fit well with the news cycle, and I think you want to avoid turning out something quick and shoddy. Even if you could write a piece in zero time, if you’re trying to get it published with editors you’ve never made contact with, it might take weeks to get someone to pay attention, which is too long for news events. A few potential solutions:

  1. write evergreen pieces.
  2. if you have something inherently time-sensitive, send it to places that are more likely to publish it quickly -- editors you’ve previously made contact with, less competitive publications. I have never managed to get a time-sensitive piece published with an editor I’ve never contacted before.
  3. anticipate events. For example, I wrote a piece about the Ferguson grand jury decision about two days after it was announced. Because I knew the decision was coming, I did most of the analysis beforehand and sent the piece to an editor I already knew before the news broke.

Trying to publish about breaking news events is high-risk (you might not get published at all) but high-reward (because it might get widely shared).

A final note: regardless of whether your piece is evergreen, you can often make it more appealing by adding a hook that references a recent event.

4. Don’t be a prima donna. Keep in mind that editors are older than you, have all the power, and may be talking about you and rejecting your work for the next several decades; don’t be arrogant with your credentials or opinion of your writing. Example of what not to do: I was once working with an editor on a piece right after I had gotten my wisdom teeth taken out. Still a little sleepy from anesthesia, I read the editor’s proposed changes and shot her an email saying, “no, my friend at the New York Times thinks we should do it this way…” The editor did not work at the New York Times, and this did not go over well. Don’t do stuff like that. Also probably don’t email editors while high on surgical drugs.

In general, I am especially deferential when dealing with editors. I happily accept whatever money they do (or usually don’t) offer. I do not complain when they choose a title I dislike. When they are unquestionably misstating statistical results, I say “I think this might be slightly misleading”. When they reject my pieces, I thank them for their time, and when they publish them, I thank them about eight times. When I am actively working with an editor on a piece, I drop almost everything else to work on it. Etc.

5. Write something only you can write. My way to do this is to use data that no one else has. Find the way that works for you. If what you’re writing could be written by any smart person with access to Google, it’s less likely to be published. (Take this piece on income inequality by Nick Kristof, for example. I like this piece and I am glad someone wrote it. But there’s no need for me to attempt to write it because Nick Kristof can do a better job of it than I can and more people want to listen to him anyway.) Other people I know who have gotten published while in school have often leveraged their own special knowledge: for example, Sam Sussman has used his Israel-Palestine expertise, Julian has used his knowledge of China, and Seth Stephens-Davidowitz has used Google data.

If you have further questions, disagreements, or tips of your own, shoot me an email so I can update this post if necessary!

32 comments:

  1. A personal mission statement, also referred to as a non-public perception affirmation, is a simple outline of your beliefs and ambitions. See more fellowship personal statements

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The information which you have provided is very good. It is very useful who is looking for game testing services

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's great to be here and to learn more about software testing. I'm a software tester in a leading Software testing companies. This a great knowledge for all beginners. Appreciate your effort to write about this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Right now id verification service is very popular amongst individuals. Trust Swiftly is the sole platform that delivers many verification systems, and a corporation can provide much better stability to their business by utilizing most of the verification systems. By addressing this unique trust swiftly website, you can acquire more information about id verification service.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've browse the many reviews and suggestions posted because of the readers for this information are really high-quality,We're going to wait for your future write-up so only.Thanks!สล็อตออนไลน์

    ReplyDelete
  7. I definitely enjoying every single minimal little bit of it. It is a great Internet site and pleasant share. I wish to thank you. Excellent task! You fellas do a great web site, and also have some good contents. Sustain the good get the job done.สล็อต 999

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wow i can say this is an additional excellent short article as envisioned of this site.Bookmarked This website..สล็อตวอเลท

    ReplyDelete
  9. Excellent survey, I'm positive you are acquiring a good response.สล็อตแตกง่าย

    ReplyDelete
  10. It had been an excellent put up without a doubt. I thoroughly loved studying it in my lunch time. Will certainly appear and go to this site additional often. Thanks for sharing.บา คา ร่า วอ เลท

    ReplyDelete
  11. Your do the job is excellent And that i take pleasure in you and hopping for many more instructive posts. Thank you for sharing good info to us.บา คา ร่า วอ เลท

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey There. I discovered your site making use of msn. This is an extremely perfectly published report. I’ll you should definitely bookmark it and come back to examine additional of your respective useful facts. Thanks for the write-up. I’ll unquestionably return.สล็อตเว็บใหญ่

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for one more wonderful publish. Where by else could any one get that sort of details in these types of an ideal means of creating?บา คา ร่า วอ เลท

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for Several other insightful website. The area else may I get that sort of knowledge published in these an ideal approach? I've a enterprise that I am basically now operating on, And that i’ve been within the look out for these facts.สล็อต ฝาก-ถอน true wallet ไม่มี บัญชีธนาคาร

    ReplyDelete
  15. Some truly superb Focus on behalf in the operator of this Online web site , completely terrific content .บาคาร่าวอเลท

    ReplyDelete
  16. You have a genuine means for creating exclusive content. I like how you're thinking that and just how you represent your sights in this post. I concur together with your means of pondering. Thanks for sharing.สล็อตทรูวอเลท

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm frequently amazed by the quantity of information offered on this topic. What you presented was properly investigated and nicely worded in order to get your stand on this across to all of your viewers.สล็อตแตกง่าย

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wonderful post. I used to be examining consistently this blog and I am impressed! Very valuable details specifically the last section I take care of this sort of facts quite a bit. I was trying to get this distinct information for an exceedingly long time. Thanks and good luck.สล็อตxo

    ReplyDelete
  19. Many thanks my homepage a lot of for sharing this amazing information! I am hunting forward to view much more postsby you!เว็บสล็อต

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks for a fascinating weblog. What else may I get that kind of information written in this sort of an excellent solution? I've an enterprise that I am just now functioning on, And that i are on the lookout for this sort of info.เว็บสล็อตเว็บตรง

    ReplyDelete
  21. I believe This really is an useful article and it is very effective and professional. Consequently, I would want to thank you with the endeavors you have designed in composing this text. All the articles is totally nicely-investigated. Many thanks...เว็บตรงสล็อต

    ReplyDelete
  22. I can’t think focusing extended ample to investigate; significantly less generate this type of report. You’ve outdone on your own using this type of substance indisputably. It is amongst the best contentsเว็บ ตรง.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Wow! These types of an incredible and helpful post This really is. I really really love it. It's so fantastic and so amazing. I am just amazed. I hope that you continue on to do your operate such as this Down the road alsoเกมสล็อต

    ReplyDelete
  24. Extremely informative write-up! You will find there's ton of information in this article which will help any enterprise start with A prosperous social networking campaign.สล็อต เว็บ ตรง

    ReplyDelete
  25. The assignments help offered by dedicated writers of BookMyEssay are of premium quality. Avail the best Dissertation Proofreading Help Service and get the desired urgently within 2 hours and according to the given guidelines.

    ReplyDelete